We will soon create AI systems that are conscious according to some influential, mainstream theories of consciousness but are not conscious according to other influential, mainstream theories of consciousness. We will not be in a position to know which theories are correct and whether we are surrounded by AI systems as richly and meaningfully conscious as human beings or instead only by systems as experientially blank as toasters. None of the standard arguments either for or against AI consciousness take us far.
Table of ContentsChapter One: Hills and Fog Chapter Two: What Is Consciousness? What Is AI? Chapter Three: Ten Possibly Essential Features of Consciousness Chapter Four: Against Introspective and Conceptual Arguments for Essential Features Chapter Five: Materialism and Functionalism Chapter Six: The Turing Test and the Chinese Room Chapter Seven: The Mimicry Argument Against AI Consciousness Chapter Eight: Global Workspace Theories and Higher Order Theories Chapter Nine: Integrated Information, Local Recurrence, Associative Learning, and Iterative Natural Kinds Chapter Ten: Does Biological Substrate Matter? Chapter Eleven: The Problem of Strange Intelligence Chapter Twelve: The Leapfrog Hypothesis and the Social Semi-Solution
Draft available here.
Per my usual custom, anyone who gives comments on the entire manuscript (by email please, to my academic address at ucr.edu) will receive not only the usual acknowledgement but an appreciatively signed copy once it appears in print.
From: Comments on "Ten Purportedly Essential Features of Consciousness : The Splintered Mind"...Arnold said: If we agree today-consciousness is learning about one's own being...then we can say we might find ourselves... emerging/balancing between introspection and extrospection...
ReplyDeleteI meant to ask above/about "Chapter Four: Against Introspective and Conceptual Arguments for Essential Features" ...the phrasing seems a contradiction, as introspection is from/for essence...could you just as well have said 'against extrospection...'
ReplyDeleteI must make time to peruse your draft, particularly Chapter Three. I like the scepticism there with the use of the modifier, *possible*. Best not to get one's toes chewed by pesky little, swarming fish, eh? I hope, by now, you know I am not a robot. Several blogs I visit are no longer sure, it seems. Thanks, Eric!
ReplyDeleteBy-the-by, I have been thinking about reflective thinking (RT), espoused by someone I know little of. I can't know if RT is anything different to what I do KNOW. My brother is, may I say, sceptical. We grew up in troubled times. Hah! We thought we had it bad! Yeah.
ReplyDelete