tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post115048133313484060..comments2024-03-25T11:49:21.281-07:00Comments on The Splintered Mind: Thoughts That LingerEric Schwitzgebelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11541402189204286449noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-1152713419642049532006-07-12T07:10:00.000-07:002006-07-12T07:10:00.000-07:00That's a helpful list of options, Genius. So I wo...That's a helpful list of options, Genius. So I wonder: How can they be separated out empirically, or introspectively?Eric Schwitzgebelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11541402189204286449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-1152713262247167112006-07-12T07:07:00.000-07:002006-07-12T07:07:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Eric Schwitzgebelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11541402189204286449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-1152693559496285452006-07-12T01:39:00.000-07:002006-07-12T01:39:00.000-07:00Yes I think I do have that effect and it seems log...Yes I think I do have that effect and it seems logical that you it would happen...<BR/><BR/>I wonder if the lingering thought <BR/><BR/>1) has the form of a sentence in a very obscure manner OR if not then]<BR/><BR/>2) if it is an ancestor of a sentence - so it is a hint of how a person who can't speak might think OR<BR/><BR/>3) if it is a complex web of associations that in essence carry the information of the sentence but is more a result of the sentence than another system.Geniushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11624496692217466430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-1152635726432229802006-07-11T09:35:00.000-07:002006-07-11T09:35:00.000-07:00Broad questions, indeed! There is surely much to ...Broad questions, indeed! There is surely much to explore in this relatively neglected corner of philosophy / phenomenology!Eric Schwitzgebelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11541402189204286449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-1152617832883387902006-07-11T04:37:00.000-07:002006-07-11T04:37:00.000-07:00I don´t know why the topic of inner speech is not ...I don´t know why the topic of inner speech is not include in the "canon" of philosophical interests. <BR/>You are doing a good thing pressing on that. <BR/><BR/>My tantalizing qizz (and i´m sure yours as well) is what could be the philosophical difference between auditory verbal hallucinations, inner speech and spoken langauge if both normal healthy subjects and patients have inner speech preceding language with respect of its outward form? If inner speech is a preparatory clausule to spoken language what is the "inner speech" of inner speech or inner spech emerge spontaneously? We can talk of inner speech in the same manner than spoken language confering it a logic, semantics... or it fall prey of Wittgenstein´s private language obstacles? Luck with this philosophical arena to wander, is of huge importance.Anibal Monasterio Astobizahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03121020811080165520noreply@blogger.com