tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post7143434109426967148..comments2024-03-25T11:49:21.281-07:00Comments on The Splintered Mind: The Egg Came First (Repost)Eric Schwitzgebelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11541402189204286449noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-22137969275167121012022-12-01T12:58:23.909-08:002022-12-01T12:58:23.909-08:00https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-022-01516-z...https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-022-01516-z#citeas<br /><br />About DNA RNA replication's in origin environments...<br /><br />Could be new stable starting point for philosophy...<br />.Arnoldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02580641063222662041noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-55906480696564522562022-11-27T20:12:11.180-08:002022-11-27T20:12:11.180-08:00🤮🤮Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-40994603888419414702022-11-27T14:59:02.305-08:002022-11-27T14:59:02.305-08:00Then 'ragged boarders' become searching fo...Then 'ragged boarders' become searching for ways to 'temporally' proceed, thanks...<br /><br />Good luck with your revisions and COVID...mine lasted 25 days before I tested negative...<br />...with mostly flue and head cold systems...Arnoldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02580641063222662041noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-81877635829491954892022-11-27T13:23:03.003-08:002022-11-27T13:23:03.003-08:00@ Phil Tanny
RE "thanks for the reminder tha...@ Phil Tanny<br /><br />RE "thanks for the reminder that I need to get off my butt, and go get the next booster. The note I've had on my desk for a month about that is unlikely to protect me."<br /><br />The "booster" or "vaccine" LIKELY will harm you, and not protect you in any way at all.<br /><br />A sharp 12 year old can see, and could see, from the start, that Covid-19 has nothing to do with real science but is a total SCAM. Yet, nearly 3 years later most people, including yourself, STILL have not figured that out yet and are still deeply asleep.<br /><br />Why is that?<br /><br />A coherent theory has been proposed, see “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” at https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html<br /><br />“… normal and healthy discontent .. is being termed extremist.” — Martin Luther King, Jr, 1929-1968, Civil Rights ActivistSetibhinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-34600545697870248132022-11-27T05:56:48.249-08:002022-11-27T05:56:48.249-08:00I’ll have to think this ova. I’ll have to think this ova. Dan Polowetzkynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-85988480467990251902022-11-27T01:36:19.244-08:002022-11-27T01:36:19.244-08:00Feel better Eric! The "Blobject"! Eric...Feel better Eric! The "Blobject"! Eric offers us exciting new terminology for both science and spirituality! You read it here first... :-) <br /><br />I'm attempting to point to how thought imposes a pattern of division on everything it touches, a form of distortion. Consider the noun "tree". In thought there seems to be a neat and tidy dividing line between "tree", "rock", and "water" etc. In reality, the tree is totally dependent on, intimately connected to, inseparable from the Blobject. <br /><br />At human scale on the surface of the Earth it's useful to say "the sun rises" because that perception is a universal human experience. From a wider perspective that statement is completely wrong.<br /><br />From a limited perspective it's useful to point to the chicken and the egg along a timeline. From a wider perspective there is only the Blobject, and only now. <br /><br />To my limited knowledge, both science and religion are commenting on the Blobject, each in their own way. As example, didn't we hear Einstein say something about time being an illusion? <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Phil Tannyhttps://www.facebook.com/phil.tanny/posts/pfbid028vNnknjphbS3kQdGW8eat6KDp1teZTfMu2TAtj6eKQUg1cVE6VgFekzy8g38cp4jlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-25887860764254170532022-11-26T17:27:48.419-08:002022-11-26T17:27:48.419-08:00Ha! Or put another way, there is no chicken, ther...Ha! Or put another way, there is no chicken, there is no egg, there is only the single great Blobject.Eric Schwitzgebelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16274774112862434865noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26951738.post-53784452310195946702022-11-26T02:22:03.138-08:002022-11-26T02:22:03.138-08:00Eric, good luck with covid! And thanks for the re...Eric, good luck with covid! And thanks for the reminder that I need to get off my butt, and go get the next booster. The note I've had on my desk for a month about that is unlikely to protect me.<br /><br />----------<br /><br />One way to look at such questions as are presented in the article can be to examine what all questions are made of, thought.<br /><br />Thought operates by dividing the single unified reality in to conceptual parts. The noun serves as an easy example.<br /><br />And so, by a process of division, we see the creation of symbolic objects such as "chicken", "egg", and "time". And then we might ask, where within the concept of "time" do the concepts "chicken" and "egg" belong? Which comes first on the timeline?<br /><br />If the apparent divisions we perceive between "chicken" and "egg" and "this time" and "that time" are creations of an electro-chemical information medium called thought, which operates by a process of division...<br /><br />If these perceived divisions are not a property of reality, but instead a property of the tool being used to observe reality...<br /><br />Then the question is answered. There is only one thing, and one time.<br /><br />Such a claim can be examined in philosophy of course, and undoubtably has been already many times. While that's fun, the problem that arises here is that philosophy, all of it, is made of thought, that which is generating the perception of division. And so, if it is true that there is only one thing, and only one time, we are unlikely to see that when looking through a device whose purpose is to divide.<br /><br />If that's true then a serious investigator might find themselves making a journey from philosophy to a human experience which could perhaps be labeled "aphilosophy", that is, not of philosophy, not of thought.<br /><br />Meditators have been exploring this territory for thousands of years. We might learn from them, except that as soon as they file a report on their experience they are back in the land of philosophy, back in the land of thought, back in the land of division, as is this post.<br />Phil Tannyhttps://www.facebook.com/phil.tanny/posts/pfbid028vNnknjphbS3kQdGW8eat6KDp1teZTfMu2TAtj6eKQUg1cVE6VgFekzy8g38cp4jlnoreply@blogger.com