Critics' pieces (links are through Ingenta):
- Josh Weisberg: Introduction (p. 7-20)
- Christopher Hill: How to study introspection (p. 21-43)
- Claire Petitmengin: Describing the experience of describing? The blindspot of introspection (p. 44-62)
- Charles Siewert: Socratic introspection and the abundance of experience (p. 63-91)
- Eric Klinger: Response organization of mental imagery, evaluation of Descriptive Experience Sampling, and alternatives (p. 92-101)
- Gualtiero Piccinini: Scientific methods must be public, and Descriptive Experience Sampling qualifies (p. 102-117)
- John Sutton: Time, experience, and Descriptive Experience Sampling (p. 118-129)
- Mark Engelbert and Peter Carruthers: Descriptive Experience Sampling: What is it good for? (p. 130-149)
- Michael J. Kane: Describing, debating, and discovering inner experience (p. 150-164)
- Maja Spener: Using first-person data about consciousness (p. 165-179)
- Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons: Introspection and the phenomenology of free will: Problems and prospects (p. 180-205)
Responses by Russ and me:
- Russell T. Hurlburt and Eric Schwitzgebel: Presuppositions and background assumptions (p. 206-233)
- Russell T. Hurlburt and Eric Schwitzgebel: Little or no experience outside of attention? (p. 234-252)
- Russell T. Hurlburt and Eric Schwitzgebel: Methodological pluralism, armchair introspection, and DES as the epistemic tribunal (p. 252-273)
- Russell T. Hurlburt: Nine clarifications of Descriptive Experience Sampling (p. 274-287)
- Eric Schwitzgebel: The philosophical and psychological context of DES (p. 288-294)
- Russell T. Hurlburt and Neda Raymond: Agency: A case study in bracketing presuppositions (p. 295-305)
I wish I could link you through to open-access penultimate drafts, but JCS didn't seem to be keen on that idea. Feel free to email me, though, and I can send you PDFs of the work on which I am co-author (for personal use).
No comments:
Post a Comment