Her son followed but did not understand. After a while, he walked toward school.
That afternoon, the phone rang in her car. That afternoon, she received a parking ticket. That evening, her husband came and sat with her beneath the tree. He said some words that seemed like gentle pleading. He left, he came back, he fell asleep at her feet while she sat.
Dawn speared through the eucalyptus, painting patches on the perfect tree. The perfect tree had a thousand red elbows. The perfect tree offered the world its berries, its light, its air, its scent of apple, of dust, chocolate, rubber, marjoram, closet floors. Its leaves were a chaos on which it would be impossible to improve. She breathed the oxygen of its photosynthesis. She drew a finger across a branch, leaving an invisible trace of her skin’s oil. Her husband brought breakfast, cancelled her classes, defended her rights against the police. A friend drove her car away.
.... [For the full-length and updated version, please email me.
Beautiful, Eric!
ReplyDeleteFor a second I thought you were going to say it was the secret reason god was made.
ReplyDeleteGot that dippy feeling when suddenly the inner circle is made to eclipse and surround the outer circle.
@ Thanks, Anon! Trying to figure out if I'm any good at this....
ReplyDelete@ Callan: Interesting twist. That would fit with the layering of reality I'm trying to work with among these stories.
She alone realises what the tree is. what does that make her? If the tree is the centre of the universe, is she its circumference? and, simultaneously, vice-versa?
ReplyDeleteHow does the tree perceive her? does it worship her as much as she worships it?
Michel: I want to leave those questions open in the story as it stands. But my thought is maybe to have another story that hints toward this one, in which the world has a creator whose aim for the universe is fulfilled by the perfect tree and a lone observer for it.
ReplyDeleteThis has a Humean vibe to it. Is part of the point that anyone can care deeply about anything, where anything is ultimately pointless but at the same point anything can have a point? Even if we take the tack of seeing this as the supreme achievement of a god,as was said above, the question still remains as to why god would choose something so incongrous as the object of creation.
ReplyDeleteSo could this be a sort of aesthetic anti-realism? Or perhaps it does reveal an objective standard of beauty, which is nevertheless alien to conventional folk sensibilities.
That was lovely. This stuff should make one think and be open to interpretation.
ReplyDeleteAnd so it is.
I like it.
Le Guin's The Direction of the Road
ReplyDeleteThanks for all the encouraging comments, folks!
ReplyDelete@ Juan: Yes -- those are exactly the questions I am struggling with. I don't mean to resolve them with this piece, just invite the reader also to reflect on them.
@ Burthye: Yes, thanks!
@ Anon: I have enjoyed the Le Guin I've read in the past, but I've never read that one. I'll check it out. Thanks for the tip!
@Eric: Thanks for the response. Another question: where do you lean on the issue vis a vis the objectivity of aesthetic and/or moral values? I remember you writing a long time ago on a blog post that you were leaning towards some kind of realism. Is that still true? I'm not asking for a detailed philosophical argument either way, just want to know where your intuition lies nowadays, if anywhere.
ReplyDeleteJuan: I do still lean toward some version of realism -- but a pretty weak or deflationary realism. I continue to struggle with the issue, not quite sure where exactly to settle.
ReplyDelete