Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Percentages of Women on the Program of the Pacific APA

Tomorrow I head off to the Pacific Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association in Vancouver. (Thursday I'll be presenting my critique of Quassim Cassam's Self-Knowledge for Humans. Saturday, I'll be presenting on blameworthiness for implicit attitudes.) Given my interest in professional philosophy's skewed gender ratios (e.g. here and here), I thought I'd do a rough coding of the Pacific APA main program by gender. Alongside gender, I also coded role in the program and whether the session topic is ethics (including political philosophy).

I coded gender conservatively, declining to code names that I perceived as gender ambiguous (e.g., "Kris", "Jamie") or that I did not associate with a clear gender given my particular cultural background (most Asian names and some European names or unusual names), except when I had personal knowledge of the person's gender. As a result 13% of the names remained unclassified. In a more careful coding, I would try to get the exclusions down below 5%.

With that caveat, I found that 275/856 (32%) of Pacific APA main program participants were women. Although this may sound low, it is substantially higher than the proportion of women in the profession overall, which is typically estimated to be in the low 20%'s in North America (e.g., here). (275/856 > 21%, two-tailed exact p < .001; even classifying all ambiguous names as men yields 28% vs. 21%, exact p < .001).

These data can't fully be explained by recent changes in the proportion of women entering the profession: According to the Survey of Earned Doctorates, 27% of philosophy PhDs in 2013 were women (also 27% in 2012). So even if newly-minted PhDs are more likely to attend conferences, that wouldn't raise the percentage of women to 32%. Affirmative action might be playing a role -- probably other factors too. Plenty of room for speculation.

Since it's often thought that the gender distribution is closer to equal in ethics than in other areas of philosophy, I also coded sessions as "ethics" vs. "non-ethics" vs. "excluded" (excluded sessions being topically borderline or mixed or concerning general issues in the profession). I found the expected divergence: 38% of the ethics program participants were women, compared to 28% in non-ethics (Z = 3.0, p = .003).

Finally, I was interested to look at women's representation in different roles on the program. Some roles are much more prestigious than others: being the author of a book targeted for an author-meets-critics session is much more prestigious than chairing a session. I coded five levels of prestige:

  • 1: Author in an author-meets-critics, or award winner, or invited symposium speaker with at least one commentator focused exclusively on your work.
  • 2: Invited symposium speaker not meeting the criteria above, or "critic" at an author-meets-critics.
  • 3: Invited symposium commentator.
  • 4: Refereed colloquium speaker, or colloquium commentator.
  • 5: Session chair.
  • Excluded: APA organized sessions (e.g., on finding a community college position) and poster presentations (too few for meaningful analysis).
  • Of the people in the most prestigious roles in the program (Category 1), 13/52 (25%) are women. Although this appears to be a bit below the 32% representation of women in all other roles combined, this sample size is too small to permit any definite conclusions (one-proportion CI 14%-39%).

    In the larger group of people with fairly prestigious roles (Category 2), 59/162 (36%) are women, similar to women's overall representation in the program. The group of symposium commentators was small -- 15/44 (34%) -- but in line with the overall numbers. The proportion of women presenting (usually anonymously refereed) colloquium papers was 85/310 (27%, CI 23%-33%), and the proportion of women chairing sessions was 77/221 (35%, CI 29%-42%). Thus, I found no clear tendency for women to appear disproportionately at either a higher or lower level of prestige than men.

    Analysis of more years' data, which I hope to explore in the future, will give more power to detect smaller effect sizes, and will also allow temporal analysis, to see how representation of women in the profession has been changing over time. Ideas welcome!

    43 comments:

    1. You might want to re-think that title.

      ReplyDelete
    2. Pilot guy: Ah, right! That interpretation hadn't even occurred to me.

      ReplyDelete
    3. Changed from "Proportions" to "Percentages". Thanks!

      ReplyDelete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    15. Dear Anon, I am sorry to hear about your distress! I worry that you won't believe me when I say that your messages don't match my sense of reality, but regardless of your opinion about that issue, it seems a good idea to speak with a professional counselor about your panic attacks, if you are able to do so.

      ReplyDelete
    16. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    19. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    20. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    21. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    22. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    23. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    24. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    25. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    26. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    27. Anon: I am worried about you. If you are scared and having panic attacks, I hope that you are able to find a counselor out there to help you who respects you and whom you can respect. I believe that such counselors are out there, though you might not have success in your first or second or third try.

      ReplyDelete
    28. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    29. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    30. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    31. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    32. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    33. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    34. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    35. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    36. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    37. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    38. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    39. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    40. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    41. Anon: I am going to have to delete your comments. I'm sorry about this! They are not on topic and some of them reveal personal information about others that might make those other people uncomfortable. Allow me to reiterate my suggestion that you persist in trying to find a counselor who can help you cope with your situation -- a counselor who respects you and whom you can respect. It is worth trying multiple different counselors, if you have the resources to do so, if you don't feel that you can enter productive conversation with the first few you try.

      ReplyDelete
    42. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete
    43. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      ReplyDelete