Monday, January 20, 2020

Confucius (Kongzi) on Loving Learning

The one virtue that Confucius (Kongzi) claims for himself is that he loves learning (hao xue, 好學). For example,

The Master said, "In any village of ten households there are surely those who are as dutiful or trustworthy as I am, but there is no one who matches my love for learning" (5.28, Slingerland trans.).

It is also clear that he thinks a love of learning is rare and precious:

Duke Ai asked, "Who among your disciples might be said to love learning?"

Confucius answered, "There was one named Yan Hui who loved learning. He never misdirected his anger and never made the same mistake twice. Unfortunately, his allotted lifespan was short, and he has passed away. Now that he is gone, there are none who really love learning -- at least, I have yet to hear of one (6.3).

The Master said, "Be sincerely trustworthy and love learning, and hold fast to the good Way until death...." (8.13).

Last week after class, one of my students who had enthusiastically read the Confucius ahead of schedule told me that he too loved learning. Don't lots of university students -- at least the ones who aspire to someday be professors? Is the love of learning really as rare as Confucius says?

The answer, of course, is that when Kongzi talks about "loving learning" he means something more unusual than enjoying reading scholarly works. What exactly does he mean? And, especially, is there a way of understanding this phrase that solves the textual puzzle of understanding the value and rarity of loving learning?

The phrase hao xue 好學 appears eight times in the Analects. Perhaps the most revealing use is this:

The Master said, "The gentleman is not motivated by the desire for a full belly or a comfortable abode. He is simply scrupulous in behavior and careful in speech, drawing near to those who possess the Way in order to be set straight by them. Surely this and nothing else is what it means to love learning (1.14; cf. 17.8).

This reminds me of two other passages:

[After a story in which someone wrongly accuses Confucius of failing to understand ritual] Confucius said, "How fortunate I am! If I happen to make a mistake, others are sure to inform me." (7.31).

The Master said, "When walking with two other people, I will always find a teacher among them. I focus on those who are good and seek to emulate them, and focus on those who are bad in order to be reminded of what needs to be changed in myself" (7.22).

Although xue 學 seems sometimes merely to be book learning or the learning of skills or crafts (11.3, 13.4, 17.9), here's my guess about what is required for the genuine love of learning in Confucius's sense: You must love to be shown, or to discover, your moral faults in order that you might correct them.

That, I think, is rare indeed.

I, for one, would much rather have my faults ignored! Only with a painful and explicit act of will can I appreciate it when someone points out my moral deficiencies. I don't love being morally criticized, though I can acknowledge that it is probably good for me. Like most, I delight emotionally in appearing to myself and others to be good, but my heart sinks when I'm given the corrective feedback necessary for actually becoming morally better.

I imagine Confucius and his favorite disciple Yan Hui feeling quite differently. Kongzi is not, I think, being sarcastic (as he might appear on first read), when he says that he is fortunate in having others always ready to point out his mistakes. I imagine Confucius and Yan Hui genuinely delighting in corrective moral feedback, so they can improve and never make the same mistake twice! This love of moral criticism is what was, perhaps, the rare and special thing they possessed which made them so inspiring and which constituted the root of their difference from the rest of us.

Suppose you could cultivate this type of love of learning in yourself. Wow! Wouldn't moral improvement almost inevitably follow? Maybe, even, after 105 years of such learning, you could be free of major faults.*

------------------------------------------------

[*] To get this time estimate, I have added the 55 years of learning that Kongzi attributes to himself in 2.4 with the fifty more years of learning that in 7.17 he says he would need to be free of major faults.

[image source]

9 comments:

Howie said...

From personal experience I think this involves integrating moral critiques into one's self and into one's world view- it involves decentering and really viewing other people as equals .
It is a kind of low key reverence for others

SelfAwarePatterns said...

I don't know that anyone really likes being corrected, morally or intellectually. It seems to me implying that we should like it sets a very high standard, maybe too high, a reason for otherwise conscientious people to feel guilty.

It seems more productive to just admit that this isn't something we're going to enjoy, but that we're better off for being open to it.

Callan said...

It kind of requires moral betterment to have a one true way, doesn't it?

Eric Schwitzgebel said...

Thanks for the comments, folks!

Howie: Yes, that seems right.

SelfAware: Maybe so. But on the other hand, I find it kind of inspiring to imagine being a person who genuinely loves having their moral faults pointed out. Could I try to be a little more like that?

Callan: Endorsing one true Way is probably essential to Kongzi's moral clarity.

George Gantz said...

Thanks, Eric - a revealing insight from the ancient East. Not so dissimilar from the insight from the ancient West, found in the Greek roots for the word "philosophy" - which I paraphrase on my Home Page: "Philosophy is the use of human reason to increase wisdom, the goal of which is to live a life that is right and good."

Arnold said...

...'cultivating this type of love of learning in yourself, by genuinely delighting in corrective moral feedback' with others, for...

My take...for a way of helping being here now...

Professor, more East meets West please...

Callan said...

Well, I'll be controversial: Perhaps to endorse one true way is to not love learning? Indeed perhaps it is the opposite, it is the discarding of all other ways but the one true way and not learning any of those other ways at all. Just learning one thing out of millions of things? Is that really a love for learning?

Arnold said...

Is it that philosophy is seeing "transformative learning" has many stages many ways, where when needed...

and or...Is it that religion is seeing "transformative learning" has many stages many ways, where when needed...

and...Is it that evolution is "transformative learning" in many stages many ways, occurring where when...

...

Eric Schwitzgebel said...

Thanks for the continuing comments, folks! To respond to Callan's "controversial" remark: No, I don't think so, as long as there is room for learning and improvement *within* the one Way that you endorse -- as long as you don't think you have every nuance figured out. (Personally, I am more of a skeptic and pluralist than Confucius, though.)