Last summer, Jordan Jackson and I scraped the bibliographies of all the main-page entries of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the leading source of review articles in mainstream Anglophone philosophy. Since 2010, I've been analyzing citation patterns in the SEP. Generally, I find SEP citation rates to more plausibly measure influence in mainstream Anglophone philosophy than other bibliometric measures, such those derived from Web of Science or Google Scholar. (For example, by the SEP method the top five most cited philosophers born 1900 or later are David Lewis, W.V.O. Quine, Hilary Putnam, John Rawls, and Saul Kripke.)
Most of my SEP-based analyses aggregate by author, but it's also revealing to aggregate by work cited, for a couple of reasons. First, my author-based analyses probably overstate the influence of authors with moderate impact across many fields compared to authors with transformative impact in just one or a few fields. Second, tracking influential works is an interesting project in its own right.
Before proceeding to the list, notes and caveats.
(1.) Each work counts once per main-page bibliographic entry in the SEP. Thus, a work with a total of 33 is cited in 33 different main page entries. Subpage entries are not included.
(2.) What counts as the "same work"? The distinction admits vague and contentious cases, and implementing it mechanically raises further problems. Here's what I did: To count as the same work, the work had to begin with exactly the same title words (excluding punctuation marks, "a", "an", or "the"). Later editions were counted as the same work as earlier editions (including a few cases of "such-and-such revisited" or the like) and articles republished in collections were counted as the same work if the particular article rather than the collection as a whole was cited. Also, works that appeared first as articles then later were expanded into books with the same or similar title were counted as the same work. Multi-volume works counted as the same work, unless the title was "Complete Works" or similar.
(3.) I only included works with publication dates from 1900-2024. Older works tend not to be cited in a consistent, easily scraped format, so results for those works are inaccurate and potentially misleading.
(4.) I did not attempt to match works cited both in English and in their original language. Some translated works make the list simply in virtue of citation under their English-language title; and some untranslated works make the list simply in virtue of citation under their original-language title. Obviously, this systematically undercounts works that are cited under both their English and original-language titles.
(4.) Citations in the role of editor are not included.
(5.) Please excuse the haphazard cut-and-paste formatting. Dates are sometimes first appearance, sometimes later appearance or edition or translation.
(6.) Technical details: The matching algorithm looked for matches in the first four letters of the author's name and the first five letters of the first text appearing after numbers, punctuation marks, "the", "an", or "a", which for standardly formatted entries is the title. I then alphabetically sorted and hand-checked all bibliographic lines with at least 15 exact matches of both of the two parameters. This took several hours and was probably imperfect, but was not as difficult as it might seem. Note also: The scrape was conducted last summer, so recent entries and recent updates won't figure into the totals.
(7.) Corrections welcome, as long as they are consistent with the principles above and don't constitute a general revision, unsystematically applied on one author's behalf, of the method described in the technical details.
(8.) I'll follow up, probably in the next week or two, with some reflections on the list.
(9.) You can see the 2020 results here.
ETA Apr 9: Two follow-up posts:
The Gender and Race/Ethnicity of Authors of the Most-Cited Works of Mainstream Anglophone Philosophy (Mar 31)
[cover of Rawls's A Theory of Justice]
1. (127 citing entries) Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice 2. (92) Kripke, Saul, 1972, Naming and Necessity 3. (79) Parfit, Derek, 1984, Reasons and Persons 4. (72) Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia 5. (71) Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953 [2001], Philosophical Investigations 6. (70) Lewis, David, 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds 7. (69) Quine, W. V. O., 1960. Word and Object 8. (67) Scanlon, T. M., 1998, What We Owe to Each Other 9. (58) Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 10. (57) Rawls, John, 1996, Political Liberalism 11. (54) Chalmers, David J., 1996, The Conscious Mind 12. (49) Russell, Betrand, 1903, The Principles of Mathematics 13. (48) Lewis, David, 1973. Counterfactuals 13. (48) Sidgwick, Henry, 1907, The Methods of Ethics 13. (48) Williamson, Timothy, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits 16. (47) Kaplan, David, 1977, Demonstratives 16. (47) Moore, G.E., 1903, Principia Ethica 18. (45) Putnam, Hilary, 1975, The Meaning of "Meaning" 18. (45) Quine, W.V.O., 1951, Two Dogmas of Empiricism 20. (43) Jackson, Frank, 1998, From Metaphysics to Ethics 21. (41) Ayer, A.J., 1936, Language, Truth and Logic 22. (39) Carnap, Rudolf, 1956, Meaning and necessity 22. (39) Ross, W.D., 1931, The Right and the Good 22. (39) Ryle, Gilbert, 1949. The Concept of Mind 22. (39) van Fraassen, Bas C., 1980, The Scientific Image 26. (37) Dummett, Michael, 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language 26. (37) Evans, Gareth, 1982, The Varieties of Reference 26. (37) Mackie, J. L., 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong 26. (37) Russell, Bertrand, 1905, On Denoting 26. (37) Whitehead, Alfred North and Bertrand Russell, 1910-1913, Principia Mathematica 31. (36) Goodman, Nelson, 1954. Fact, Fiction and Forecast 32. (35) Popper, Karl R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery 32. (35) Wittgenstein, L., 1922, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 34. (34) Fodor, Jerry A., 1987, Psychosemantics 34. (34) Korsgaard, Christine M., 1996, Sources of Normativity 34. (34) Lewis, David K., 1969, Convention: A Philosophical Study 34. (34) Nozick, Robert, 1981, Philosophical Explanations 34. (34) Raz, Joseph, 1986, The Morality of Freedom 34. (34) Woodward, James, 2003, Making Things Happen 40. (33) Gauthier, David, 1986, Morals by Agreement 40. (33) McDowell, John, 1994, Mind and World 40. (33) Nagel, Thomas, 1986, The View from Nowhere 40. (33) Russell, Bertrand, 1912, The Problems of Philosophy 44. (32) Parfit, Derek, 2017, On What Matters 44. (32) Williams, Bernard, 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy 46. (31) Davidson, Donald, 1980, Essays on Actions and Events 46. (31) Gibbard, Allan, 1990, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings 46. (31) Strawson, P.F., 1959. Individuals 49. (29) Finnis, John. M, 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights 49. (29) Fricker, Miranda, 2007, Epistemic Injustice 49. (29) Longino, Helen E., 1990, Science as Social Knowledge 52. (28) Anscombe, G. E. M., 1957, Intention 52. (28) Brandom, Robert B., 1994, Making It Explicit 52. (28) Jackson, Frank, 1982, Epiphenomenal Qualia 52. (28) Pearl, Judea, 2000, Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference 52. (28) Plantinga, Alvin, 1974, The Nature of Necessity 52. (28) Quine, W. V. O., 1948, On What There Is 52. (28) Rawls, John, 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement 52. (28) Sellars, Wilfrid, 1956, Empiricism and the philosophy of mind 52. (28) van Inwagen, Peter, 1990, Material Beings 61. (27) Armstrong, David M., 1997, A World of States of Affairs 61. (27) Butler, Judith, 1990, Gender Trouble 61. (27) Dennett, Daniel C., 1991, Consciousness Explained 61. (27) Dretske, Fred I., 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information 61. (27) Hare, R.M., 1952, The Language of Morals 61. (27) Lewis, David, 1983, New Work for a Theory of Universals 61. (27) Millikan, Ruth Garrett, 1984, Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories 61. (27) Nagel, Thomas, 1974, What is It Like to Be a Bat? 61. (27) Smith, Michael, 1994, The Moral Problem 61. (27) Young, Iris Marion, 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference 71. (26) Carnap, Rudolf, 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability 71. (26) Frankfurt, Harry, 1971, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person 71. (26) Grice, Herbert Paul, 1989, Studies in the Way of Words 71. (26) Jeffrey, Richard C., 1965 [1983], The Logic of Decision 71. (26) Kripke, Saul, 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language 71. (26) Nussbaum, Martha C., 2006, Frontiers of Justice 71. (26) Searle, John R., 1983, Intentionality 78. (25) Anderson, Elizabeth S., 1999, What Is the Point of Equality? 78. (25) Armstrong, David M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of Mind 78. (25) Dworkin, Ronald, 1977, Taking Rights Seriously 78. (25) Fodor, Jerry A., 1975, The Language of Thought 78. (25) Hart, H.L.A., 1961, The Concept of Law 78. (25) Hempel, Carl G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation 78. (25) Kneale, William and Martha Kneale, 1962. The Development of Logic 78. (25) MacIntyre, Alasdair, 1984. After Virtue 78. (25) Nagel, Ernest, 1961, The Structure of Science 78. (25) Ramsey, Frank P., 1931, Truth and Probability 78. (25) Rawls, John, 1999, The Law of Peoples 78. (25) Russell, Bertrand, 1918/1919, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism 78. (25) Stalnaker, Robert, 1984, Inquiry 78. (25) Williamson, Timothy, 2007, The Philosophy of Philosophy 92. (24) Blackburn, Simon, 1998, Ruling Passions 92. (24) Brink, David O., 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics 92. (24) Burge, Tyler, 1979, Individualism and the Mental 92. (24) Dupré, John, 1993, The Disorder of Things 92. (24) Fine, Kit, 1994, Essence and Modality 92. (24) Hare, R.M., 1981, Moral Thinking 92. (24) Lewis, D., 1986, Philosophical Papers 92. (24) Quine, W. V. O., 1970, Philosophy of Logic 100. (23) Carnap, Rudolf, 1950, Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology 100. (23) Cartwright, Nancy, 1983, How the laws of physics lie 100. (23) Gilligan, Carol, 1982, In a Different Voice 100. (23) Griffin, James, 1986, Well-Being: its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance 100. (23) Kitcher, Philip, 1993, The Advancement of Science 100. (23) Putnam, Hilary, 1981, Reason, Truth and History 100. (23) Savage, Leonard J., 1954, The Foundations of Statistics 100. (23) Searle, John R., 1969, Speech Acts 100. (23) Shafer-Landau, Russ, 2005, Moral Realism 100. (23) Spirtes, Peter, Clark Glymour, and Richard Scheines, 1993, Causation, Prediction, and Search 100. (23) Stalnaker, Robert C., 1968, A Theory of Conditionals 100. (23) Turing, Alan M., 1936 [1965], On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem 112. (22) Davidson, Donald, 1963. Actions, Reasons, Causes 112. (22) Dretske, Fred, 1995, Naturalizing the Mind 112. (22) Fodor, Jerry A., 1983, Modularity of Mind 112. (22) Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver, 2000, Thinking about Mechanisms 112. (22) Street, Sharon, 2006, A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value 112. (22) van Fraassen, Bas C., 1989, Laws and Symmetry 112. (22) Zalta, Edward N., 1983, Abstract Objects 119. (21) Alcoff, Linda Martin, 2006. Visible Identities 119. (21) Brandt, Richard B., 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right 119. (21) Cartwright, Nancy, 1999, The Dappled World 119. (21) Dawkins, Richard, 1976, The Selfish Gene 119. (21) Dworkin, Ronald, 1986, Law's Empire, 119. (21) Field, Hartry, 1989, Realism, Mathematics and Modality 119. (21) Fodor, Jerry A., 1974, Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis) 119. (21) Gettier, Edmund L., 1963, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? 119. (21) Longino, H. 2001, The Fate of Knowledge 119. (21) Nussbaum, Martha C., 2000. Women and Human Development 119. (21) Okin, Susan Moller, 1989, Justice, Gender, and the Family 119. (21) Sober, Elliott and David Wilson, 1998, Unto Others 119. (21) Strawson, Peter F., 1962, Freedom and Resentment 119. (21) Tye, Michael, 1995, Ten Problems of Consciousness 119. (21) Walzer, Michael, 1983, Spheres of Justice 119. (21) Wiggins, David, 1980, Sameness and Substance 135. (20) Austin, J.L., 1962, How to Do Things with Words 135. (20) Chisholm, Roderick M., 1957, Perceiving 135. (20) Dancy, Jonathan, 2004, Ethics Without Principles 135. (20) Darwall, Stephen, 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint 135. (20) Davidson, Donald, 1984, Inquiries into truth and interpretation 135. (20) Dennett, Daniel C., 1987, The Intentional Stance 135. (20) Dworkin, Ronald, 2000. Sovereign Virtue 135. (20) Feyerabend, Paul K., 1975, Against Method 135. (20) Gödel, Kurt, 1931, Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I 135. (20) Husserl, Edmund, 1900-01, Logische Untersuchungen 135. (20) Quine, Willard Van Orman, 1953, From A Logical Point of View 135. (20) Reichenbach, Hans, 1938, Experience and Prediction 135. (20) Rorty, Richard, 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 135. (20) Rosen, Gideon, 2010, Metaphysical Dependence 135. (20) Wright, Crispin, 1983, Frege's Conception of Numbers as Objects 135. (20) Zalta, Edward N., 1988, Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality 151. (19) Anderson, Alan and Nuel Belnap, 1975, Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity 151. (19) Blackburn, Simon, 1984. Spreading the Word 151. (19) Blackburn, Simon, 1993, Essays in Quasi-Realism 151. (19) Chisholm, Roderick M., 1976, Person and Object 151. (19) Craver, Carl F., 2007, Explaining the Brain 151. (19) Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark, 1998. Responsibility and Control 151. (19) Grice, H. P., 1975, Logic and Conversation 151. (19) Hintikka, Jaakko, 1962, Knowledge and Belief 151. (19) Keynes, John Maynard, 1921, A Treatise on Probability 151. (19) Lewis, David, 1979, Attitudes De Dicto and De Se 151. (19) Parsons, Terence, 1980, Nonexistent Objects 151. (19) Pogge, Thomas, 2002 [2008], World Poverty and Human Rights 151. (19) Priest, Graham, 1987, In Contradiction 151. (19) Salmon, Nathan, 1986, Frege's Puzzle 151. (19) Sider, Theodore, 2001, Four-Dimensionalism 151. (19) Tarski, A., 1983, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics 151. (19) Thomasson, Amie L., 1999, Fiction and Metaphysics 151. (19) Williamson, Timothy, 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics 169. (18) Armstrong, D., 1989, Universals: An Opinionated Introduction 169. (18) Barnes, Jonathan, 1982, The Presocratic Philosophers 169. (18) Chisholm, Roderick M., 1966, Theory of Knowledge 169. (18) Fodor, J., 1992, A Theory of Content and Other Essays 169. (18) Gibbard, Allan, 2003, Thinking How to Live 169. (18) Goodman, Nelson, 1968, Languages of Art 169. (18) Hacking, Ian, 1983, Representing and Intervening 169. (18) Harman, Gilbert, 1986, Change in View 169. (18) Hilbert, David and Wilhelm Ackermann, 1928, Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik 169. (18) Kahneman, Daniel, 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow 169. (18) Kittay, Eva Feder, 1999, Love's Labor 169. (18) Lewis, David K., 1991, Parts of Classes 169. (18) Lewis, David, 1973, Causation 169. (18) Moore, G. E., 1912. Ethics 169. (18) Noë, Alva, 2004, Action in Perception 169. (18) Prior, Arthur N., 1967, Past, Present and Future 169. (18) Salmon, Wesley, 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World 169. (18) Schaffer, Jonathan, 2009, On What Grounds What 169. (18) Searle, John R., 1992, The Rediscovery of the Mind 169. (18) Stich, Stephen P., 1983, From folk psychology to cognitive science 169. (18) Taylor, Charles, 1989, Sources of the Self 169. (18) Walton, Kendall, 1990, Mimesis as Make-Believe 169. (18) Wright, Crispin, 1992, Truth and Objectivity 192. (17) Annas, Julia, 1993, The Morality of Happiness 192. (17) Anscombe, G.E.M., 1958, Modern Moral Philosophy 192. (17) Benacerraf, Paul, 1973, Mathematical Truth 192. (17) Carnap, Rudolf, 1928. Der logische Aufbau der Welt 192. (17) Davidson, Donald, 1970, Mental Events 192. (17) Dretske, Fred, 1988, Explaining behavior 192. (17) Field, Hartry, 1980, Science Without Numbers 192. (17) Goldman, Alvin, 1979, What is Justified Belief? 192. (17) Graham, Angus C., 1989, Disputers of the Tao 192. (17) Grice, H. P., 1957, Meaning 192. (17) Guthrie, W.K.C., 1962-1981, A History of Greek Philosophy 192. (17) Hooker, Brad, 2000, Ideal Code, Real World 192. (17) Howson, Colin and Peter Urbach, 2006, Scientific Reasoning 192. (17) Hull, David L., 1988, Science as a Process 192. (17) Kagan, Shelly, 1989, The Limits of Morality 192. (17) Kim, Jaegwon, 1998, Mind in a Physical World 192. (17) Kleene, Stephen Cole, 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics 192. (17) Lewis, David, 1980, A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance 192. (17) List, Christian and Philip Pettit, 2011, Group Agency 192. (17) MacKinnon, Catherine, 1989, Towards a Feminist Theory of the State 192. (17) Marr, David, 1982, Vision 192. (17) Peacocke, Christopher, 1992, A Study of Concepts 192. (17) Plantinga, Alvin, 2000, Warranted Christian Belief 192. (17) Ross, W.D., 1939, Foundations of Ethics 192. (17) Russell, B., 1914, Our Knowledge of the External World 192. (17) Schneewind, J. B., 1998. The Invention of Autonomy 192. (17) Tarski, Alfred, 1935, The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages 192. (17) van Inwagen, Peter, 1983. An Essay on Free Will 192. (17) Von Neumann, John and Oskar Morgenstern, 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 221. (16) Adams, Robert Merrihew, 1994, Leibniz 221. (16) Armstrong, D. M., 1978, Universals and Scientific Realism 221. (16) Axelrod, Robert and William D. Hamilton, 1981, The Evolution of Cooperation 221. (16) Butler, Judith, 1993. Bodies That Matter 221. (16) Churchland, Paul M., 1981, Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes 221. (16) Clark, Andy and David J. Chalmers, 1998, The Extended Mind 221. (16) Dummett, Michael, 1991, The Logical Basis of Metaphysics 221. (16) Fine, Kit, 2001, The Question of Realism 221. (16) Frankfurt, Harry, 1988. The Importance of What We Care About 221. (16) Frege, Gottlob, 1918/1956, The Thought: A Logical Inquiry 221. (16) Geach, Peter, 1962, Reference and Generality 221. (16) Gödel, Kurt, 1944, Russell's Mathematical Logic 221. (16) Hare, R. M., 1963. Freedom and Reason 221. (16) Horgan, Terence and John Tienson, 2002, The Intentionality of Phenomenology and the Phenomenology of Intentionality 221. (16) Irwin, Terence. H., 2008, The Development of Ethics 221. (16) Joyce, James M., 1999, The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory 221. (16) Kane, Robert, 1996, The Significance of Free Will 221. (16) Lipton, Peter, 1971 [2003], Inference to the Best Explanation 221. (16) Lloyd, Genevieve, 1984, The Man of Reason 221. (16) McMahan, Jeff, 2002, The Ethics of Killing 221. (16) Mellor, D.H., 1981, Real Time 221. (16) Perry, John, 1979, The Problem of the Essential Indexical 221. (16) Popper, Karl, 1962. Conjectures and refutations 221. (16) Raz, J., 1990. Practical reason and norms 221. (16) Russell, Bertrand, 1927, The Analysis of Matter 221. (16) Sandel, Michael J., 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice 221. (16) Scheffler, Samuel, 1982, The Rejection of Consequentialism 221. (16) Stalnaker, Robert, 1978, Assertion 221. (16) Stevenson, Charles L., 1944, Ethics and Language 221. (16) Swinburne, Richard, 1977, The Coherence of Theism 221. (16) Tye, Michael, 2000, Consciousness, Color, and Content 221. (16) Williams, Bernard, 1981, Moral Luck 221. (16) Williams, George C., 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection
4 comments:
Gemini and me...smiling/happily reading along-this post, I laughed out loud at caveat 7, ...thanks
Is it possible, in The Philosophy Science...that The Unity of Science (SEP) is replacing mainstream anglophone philosophy...for philosophy to have meaning today...
Thanks Eric, really interesting. But in light of caveat 3, shouldn't the title of the post be revised? Otherwise one gets the impression that Rawl's A Theory of Justice is cited more times than Plato's Republic, Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, or Kant's Critique of Practical Reason. It would be interesting to know if that were true. As it is, it is interesting to know what are "The 253 Most Cited Works in the SEP".
I meant to say "The 253 Most Cited Works (published between 1900-2024) in the SEP".
You're right, that title would be clearer, though more of a mouthful. In my 2020 analysis, I did include pre-1900 works:
https://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-233-most-cited-works-in-stanford.html
The most cited was Hume's Treatise, tied for 18th. I think that's likely to be misleadingly low, since historical citations are often not formatted in an easily scrapable way, and so are missed by my analysis, and sometimes historical authors are mentioned by name without citation. Still, even with those corrections I suspect no pre-1900 author would have cracked the top five.
Post a Comment